![]() One can also hope that all the other tests will receive the attention they deserve. applies mark up and displays the result correctly, we can never guarantee an open, fully interoperable web.Ī highly visible test like Acid 3 hopefully helps to promote such interoperability. Without tests that check how well a certain browser follows standards, i.e. (We provide links to some of them below.) In fact many other test suites are far more important. Acid3 was not meant to be the one and only indication of a browser’s performance. It will give some indication of a browsers speed, though. Compared to Slickspeed, Sun Spider, the V8 test suite or Dromaeo Acid3 is not so thorough. No subtest may take too long – and especially subtest 26 is challenging. The third test is the so called “smoothness” criterion. Some of them are high on many designers’ wish list: Text shadow, downloadable fonts, and display: inline-block. ![]() Some of the scripted subtests produce results that affect the rendering, but there are also rendering issues that come in addition to these. ![]() Admittedly a few others test edge cases and more esoteric features – but the test was supposed to be a significant challenge! Many subtests are high on a developer’s wish list: Full CSS 3 selectors support, media queries, SVG fonts. Getting a score of 100 is not the same as passing Acid3 – a common misconception, or perhaps an oversimplification. The main part of test is automated through JavaScript, a sort of test harness that runs 100 subtests. To answer these misconceptions we need to address the issue of what exactly is being tested and how. Quite a few other people seem to think that Webkit and Gogi (Opera’s internal build) passed the test already in March – despite the fact that neither team has made this claim. Some people have been saying things like ”my browser does not pass the test and I have no problems using it”. There has been some confusion about the test and its importance. What exactly does it mean to pass the Acid3 test? Congratulations to the Webkit team, but even more we would like to congratulate the average web user – who in a few years thanks to our test we hope will get a better experience! And no doubt this is a great achievement. Now the Surfin Safari blog has announced that the team behind Webkit considers that they have passed the test in every aspect. It is often mentioned in blogs and articles. When Google Chrome was launched almost every review included our little test as an indicator of standards support. Recent Task Force Buzz Acid3 receptions and misconceptions and do we have a winner?Īcid3 is probably the most visible thing that WaSP has done the last year. The Web Standards Project is a grassroots coalition fighting for standards which ensure simple, affordable access to web technologies for all. Please contact us and we will respond as quickly as possible. If the test is run on a slow computer or device, it may run slowly or not smoothly and this does not imply non-conformance. The test does not attempt to make any comparisons or judgments as to the performance of any hardware used, and should not be used as a hardware benchmark. The Acid3 test measures some performance characteristics. Changing the zoom level, minimum font size, applying a fit-to-width algorithm, or making other changes may alter the rendition of the test page without this constituting a failure in compliance. When taking the test, you should use the default settings of the browser you are testing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |